Personal Injury Law Blogs

The Benefits of Hiring a Local Burn Injury Lawyer Los Angeles

Understanding Burn Injuries and Their Impact

Burn injuries can be incredibly traumatic, leaving victims with both physical and emotional scars. Whether caused by accidents at home, workplace incidents, or faulty products, the consequences can be severe and life-altering. That’s where a burn injury lawyer in Los Angeles can make a significant difference in your recovery journey.

The Role of a Burn Injury Lawyer

When you’re dealing with the aftermath of a burn injury, having a specialized lawyer on your side is crucial. A burn injury lawyer in Los Angeles will help navigate the complex legal landscape, ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve. These professionals understand the nuances of burn injury cases and can provide the expertise needed to handle insurance companies, medical bills, and legal procedures.

Why Local Expertise Matters

Hiring a local burn injury lawyer in Los Angeles has distinct advantages. Local lawyers have a deep understanding of state laws and regulations, which can be pivotal in building a strong case. They are familiar with local courts, judges, and other attorneys, which can provide an edge in negotiations and litigation.

Real-Life Example: The Johnson Family’s Story

Consider the Johnson family, who suffered a devastating house fire due to a faulty heater. The burns were severe, and the medical expenses were overwhelming. By hiring a local burn injury lawyer in Los Angeles, they were able to secure a substantial settlement. The lawyer’s local expertise and connections played a key role in their success, ensuring the Johnsons could focus on healing without the financial burden.

Navigating the Legal Process

The legal process following a burn injury can be daunting. From filing claims to negotiating settlements, each step requires careful attention and expertise. A burn injury lawyer in Los Angeles will guide you through this process, offering support and advice at every turn. They will gather evidence, consult with medical experts, and build a compelling case to maximize your compensation.

Maximizing Compensation: What to Expect

Compensation in burn injury cases can cover a wide range of damages, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. A skilled burn injury lawyer in Los Angeles will meticulously evaluate your case to ensure all potential damages are accounted for. They will fight tirelessly to secure the maximum compensation possible, helping you rebuild your life after a traumatic event.

The Importance of Timely Action

Time is of the essence in burn injury cases. California law sets strict deadlines for filing personal injury claims, known as the statute of limitations. A burn injury lawyer in Los Angeles will ensure all necessary paperwork is filed promptly, preventing any delays that could jeopardize your case. Acting quickly also helps preserve crucial evidence and strengthens your position in negotiations.

Choosing the Right Lawyer

Selecting the right burn injury lawyer in Los Angeles can significantly impact the outcome of your case. Look for a lawyer with a proven track record in handling burn injury cases, positive client testimonials, and a commitment to personalized service. During your initial consultation, ask about their experience, approach to handling cases, and success stories to ensure they are the right fit for your needs.

Real-Life Example: Maria’s Journey to Justice

Maria, a restaurant worker, suffered severe burns from a kitchen accident. She struggled with medical bills and lost wages while trying to recover. After hiring a burn injury lawyer in Los Angeles, Maria received expert legal guidance and support. Her lawyer successfully negotiated a settlement that covered her expenses and provided financial stability during her recovery.

Conclusion: The Path to Recovery

Dealing with a burn injury is challenging, but you don’t have to face it alone. A burn injury lawyer in Los Angeles can provide the expertise, support, and advocacy you need to secure fair compensation and focus on your recovery. Their local knowledge and legal acumen will be invaluable as you navigate the complex legal landscape.

Why You Need Car Accident Attorneys in Los Angeles for Your Injury Claim

If you’ve been in a car accident in Los Angeles, hiring car accident attorneys in Los Angeles can be a game changer.

Understanding the Legal Maze

Los Angeles is a bustling city, and unfortunately, that means a high number of car accidents. Navigating the legal system here can be overwhelming. Imagine trying to handle paperwork, deal with insurance companies, and recover from injuries all at once. That’s where a car accident attorney steps in to ease your burden.

Real-Life Example: Sarah’s Story

Consider Sarah, a local schoolteacher who was hit by a distracted driver. She thought she could handle the insurance claims herself, but soon found herself buried in medical bills and complex legal terms. A friend recommended a seasoned car accident attorney who took over her case, handled the negotiations, and secured a settlement that covered all her expenses and more.

The Importance of Timely Action

Time is of the essence when it comes to car accident claims. California has a statute of limitations for personal injury claims, typically two years from the date of the accident. Delaying can mean losing your right to compensation. An attorney ensures all deadlines are met and your case is filed correctly.

Why Not Handle It Yourself?

You might wonder if you can just handle the claim yourself. Sure, that’s possible, but consider this: insurance companies are skilled at minimizing payouts. They have teams of lawyers working to protect their interests. Without the expertise of a car accident attorney, you might end up with a fraction of the compensation you deserve.

The Role of a Car Accident Attorney

A good attorney doesn’t just represent you in court. They investigate the accident, gather evidence, interview witnesses, and work with experts to build a strong case. They also negotiate with insurance companies on your behalf.

Real-Life Example: Mark’s Battle

Mark, a delivery driver, faced an uphill battle after a severe accident. The insurance company offered a settlement that barely covered his hospital bills. Feeling defeated, he contacted a car accident attorney. The attorney uncovered crucial evidence proving the other driver’s negligence, leading to a much larger settlement that covered Mark’s long-term rehabilitation and lost wages.

Emotional and Psychological Support

Dealing with a car accident is not just about physical injuries. The emotional and psychological toll can be significant. An attorney can connect you with support services and ensure that the emotional aspect of your suffering is factored into your compensation.

The Cost of Hiring an Attorney

Worried about the cost? Most car accident attorneys in Los Angeles work on a contingency fee basis. This means they only get paid if you win your case. This arrangement makes legal help accessible to everyone, regardless of their financial situation.

How to Choose the Right Attorney

Choosing the right attorney is crucial. Look for someone with a strong track record in car accident cases, excellent reviews, and who makes you feel comfortable and heard.

Real-Life Example: Julia’s Victory

Julia was skeptical about hiring an attorney after her accident. She did some research and found a highly recommended lawyer. The attorney’s expertise was evident from the start. Julia received a settlement that not only covered her medical bills but also compensated her for pain and suffering, something she wouldn’t have known to claim on her own.

Final Thoughts

Car accidents can turn your life upside down. Having a skilled car accident attorney in Los Angeles can make the difference between a stressful, drawn-out process and a smooth, successful claim. Don’t navigate this challenging time alone. Seek professional help and ensure your rights are fully protected.

Luis Avila personal injury law

Luis Avila is a dedicated lawyer focused on trial work and personal injury law. Since 1986, Mr. Avila fights hard to represent his clients who were harmed by the carelessness of others.

From Workplace Accidents to Toy Claims: We Have a Blog Post for That

Since the landmark Donoghue v Stevenson case over 100 years ago, personal injury law has grown to cover a wide range of situations and product liability claims —some of which might have been unimaginable back then, like those personal injury claims involving sex toys. Although rare, injuries from defective sex toys do happen, with serious consequences ranging from internal damage to emergency surgeries when products break or become lodged in the body.

If you’ve been injured by a defective product, whether at work or through a faulty sex toy, you may be entitled to compensation. These claims, no matter how unusual, fall under personal injury law, so there’s no need to feel embarrassed. Seek legal advice to protect your rights.

At Accident Claims Blawg, we have a personal injury legal blog post for every situation—whether it’s a workplace injury or an unexpected product defect. Visit our blog to explore more!

New Guide to Compensation for E-Scooter Accidents in England and Wales

Wanting to find out about the compensation claims process in respect of E-scooter accidents that occur on the roads and pavements of England and Wales? Should you or a relative be involved in a such an accident, the following recently revised comprehensive guide will serve as a useful companion.

With decades of experience as accident solicitors specialising in claims for motorbike riders and cyclists, the lawyers below offer an exhaustive analysis of the legal complexities associated with E-scooter accidents. Although laws regarding E-scooter accidents are comparable to those governing other types of collisions, riders must be aware of specific laws that can have a substantial bearing on compensation outcomes.

Click the link here to gain access to the comprehensive 2024 Compensation Guide, which is specifically designed to address E-Scooter accidents in England and Wales.

Personal Injury Legal News and Articles from Personal Injury Claims Blawg

Ten Years of Personal Injury Legal Insights

Personal Injury Claims Blawg was founded over a decade ago to share personal injury law knowledge. Years later, our commitment to this objective remains strong. Within our site you can browse our wide collection of personal injury legal news updates and articles to enlighten, educate, and engage readers interested in personal injury law.

Legal Updates on Personal Injury:

The above are some interesting personal injury legal updates from around the world. Within our blog, we cover all personal injury legal topics on our platform. Our regular personal injury legal news updates keep our readers informed of the newest advancements in this subject. We cover legislative changes, judicial judgements, and personal injury legal events quickly and insightfully, keeping you informed of the ever-changing legal scene.

Personal Injury Claims Blawg publishes articles by personal injury lawyers in the UK, personal injury attorneys in the US, and other experts, practitioners, and legal enthusiasts in addition to news updates. These articles explain complex personal injury law concepts and provide a thorough comprehension of them. Our personal injury stories cover auto accidents, medical negligence, workplace injuries, and more. Our papers appeal to seasoned legal professionals, victims seeking justice, and interested parties.

New Contributors Welcome:

In addition to sharing legal expertise, our Blawg gives personal injury lawyers a voice. We welcome prominent personal injury lawyers, law firms, and legal professionals to share their knowledge with a wider audience. We stand out by delivering this platform for free. We value knowledge and believe it should be freely shared. So, if you are a personal injury lawyer with a fascinating legal piece to share, please join our contributor community. Sharing your expertise can expand the personal injury legal discourse and readership.

Contact Us at Personal Injury Claims Blawg

Personal Injury Cases Blawg has provided legal information for over a decade. We continue to inform, educate, and engage our readers about the ever-changing legal environment of personal injury cases. Leading legal experts who share our enthusiasm for making personal injury law accessible are encouraged to contribute.

Contact us to learn how to share your first article and help us spread personal injury law knowledge – Get in touch with us through our Contact Page here.

5 Significant Medical Malpractice Cases in Canada

Whether physicians, nurses, hospitals or healthcare providers are found liable in medical malpractice lawsuits depends on two issues: whether their care fell below (or breached) the standard of care, and if so, whether that breach of the standard of care caused the poor outcome.  This article summarizes five of the leading cases on these two issues.

1. Standard of a reasonable physician: Sylvester v Crits et al.1956 CanLII 34 (ON CA), aff’d 1956 CanLII 29 (SCC), [1956] SCR 991

The standard of care is that of a reasonable physician in the circumstances.  The Court of Appeal for Ontario in Sylvester v Crits et al. set out the seminal statement on standard of care applicable to physicians as follows, and this was later endorsed by the Supreme Court of Canada:

Every medical practitioner must bring to his task a reasonable degree of skill and knowledge and must exercise a reasonable degree of care. He is bound to exercise that degree of care and skill which could reasonably be expected of a normal, prudent practitioner of the same experience and standing, and if he holds himself out as a specialist, a higher degree of skill is required of him than one who does not profess to be so qualified by special training and ability.

At issue was whether the Defendant anesthesiologist was liable after an explosion caused severe burns to the infant Plaintiff during a tonsillectomy.  The Court of Appeal reversed the trial judge’s decision to dismiss the action against the anesthesiologist and found that the anesthesiologist had been negligent in not turning off the oxygen immediately after filling the bag for ventilation and not placing the canister of ether on the floor away from the boy’s head.

2. Negligence not determined with hindsight: Lapointe v Hôpital Le Gardeur1992 CanLII 119 (SCC)

The actions of physicians are to be assessed based on the information available to them at the time and not with the benefit of hindsight.  The Supreme Court of Canada in Lapointe v Hôpital Le Gardeur held that:

[C]ourts should be careful not to rely upon the perfect vision afforded by hindsight. In order to evaluate a particular exercise of judgment fairly, the doctor’s limited ability to foresee future events when determining a course of conduct must be borne in mind. Otherwise, the doctor will not be assessed according to the norms of the average doctor of reasonable ability in the same circumstances, but rather will be held accountable for mistakes that are apparent only after the fact.

At issue was whether an emergency physician was liable after ordering the immediate transfer of an infant Plaintiff with a severe laceration to her arm before administering a blood transfusion.  Upon arrival at the pediatric hospital, the child suffered a massive cardiac arrest resulting in a severe brain injury.  The Supreme Court of Canada overturned the Court of Appeal decision and reinstated the trial judge’s decision to dismiss the action.  From the expert evidence, the trial judge found that the decision to order the immediate transfer was sound based on the information available to the Defendant at the time of ordering the transfer.

3. Specialists assessed by the standard of specialists: Ter Neuzen v Korn1995 CanLII 72 (SCC)

Consistent with Lapointe, specialists are held to the standard of specialists in their fields at the relevant time period.  The Supreme Court of Canada in in Ter Neuzen v Korn held that:

It is well settled that physicians have a duty to conduct their practice in accordance with the conduct of a prudent and diligent doctor in the same circumstances.  In the case of a specialist, such as a gynecologist and obstetrician, the doctor’s behaviour must be assessed in light of the conduct of other ordinary specialists, who possess a reasonable level of knowledge, competence and skill expected of professionals in Canada, in that field.  A specialist, such as the respondent, who holds himself out as possessing a special degree of skill and knowledge, must exercise the degree of skill of an average specialist in his field.

At issue was whether the Defendant obstetrician and gynecologist was liable for a patient of his contracting HIV after he performed an artificial insemination procedure.  The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the Court of Appeal decision to reverse the verdict of liability against the Defendant.  The state of the medical knowledge at the time was uncertain as to the risk of contracting HIV from artificial insemination and this did not become a known risk until over a year after the incident.

4. “But for” causation: Clements v Clements2012 SCC 32 (CanLII)

It must be more likely than not that the outcome would have been avoided had the Defendant not breached the standard of care.  The Supreme Court of Canada most recently set out this seminal statement of law in Clements v Clements:

[P]roof by an injured plaintiff that a defendant was negligent does not make that defendant liable for the loss.  The plaintiff must also establish that the defendant’s negligence (breach of the standard of care) caused the injury.

The test for showing causation is the “but for” test.  The plaintiff must show on a balance of probabilities that “but for” the defendant’s negligent act, the injury would not have occurred. Inherent in the phrase “but for” is the requirement that the defendant’s negligence was necessary to bring about the injury ― in other words that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant’s negligence.

At issue was whether the husband driver of a motorcycle was liable for severe injuries to his wife when he lost control of his motorcycle after he exceeded the speed limit and a nail fell out of the rear-wheel.  The Supreme Court of Canada ordered a new trial after the Court of Appeal reversed the trial judge’s determination on liability based on finding that the wife’s injuries were the result of the husband’s negligence even though “but for” causation was not established.  This decision remains the leading case on causation in medical malpractice actions even though it concerned a motorcycle crash.

5. Modified objective test for informed consent: Reibl v Hughes1980 CanLII 23 (SCC)

Whether there was a lack of informed consent for a medical procedure is assessed from the perspective of a reasonable person in the Plaintiff’s circumstances.  The Supreme Court of Canada in Reibl v Hughes set out this modified objective test for determining informed consent as follows:

In saying that the test is based on the decision that a reasonable person in the patient’s position would have made, I should make it clear that the patient’s particular concerns must also be reasonably based…  In short, although account must be taken of a patient’s particular position, a position which will vary with the patient, it must be objectively assessed in terms of reasonableness.

At issue was whether the Defendant neurosurgeon had obtained informed consent from the Plaintiff for an elective brain surgery.  The Plaintiff underwent the surgery and later suffered a massive stroke resulting in right-sided paralysis.  The Supreme Court of Canada reversed the Court of Appeal decision and restored the trial verdict of liability against the neurosurgeon.  The Court found that a reasonable person in the Plaintiff’s position would not have undergone the surgery had he or she been properly informed of the risks.

There are of course many more cases that refine the general principles set out in these five decisions and address the widely varying facts that can arise in medical malpractice lawsuits.  If you or a loved one has been injured as a result of medical malpractice, contact a lawyer at Bogoroch & Associates for a free consultation.

Bogoroch & Associates LLP is experienced in all aspects of personal injury and medical malpractice litigation. We have the confidence and skill to advance your accident or medical malpractice claim to settlement or trial while helping you navigate the complex medical, legal, and insurance issues.

Our experience, commitment to excellence, and reputation have long been recognized.  Our founding partner, Richard M. Bogoroch, has been recognized as a leading personal injury lawyer by The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory and by The Best Lawyers in Canada.  The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory and The Best Lawyers in Canada are two highly regarded lawyer rating publications.

If you or your loved one has been injured in an accident or believes that you are a victim of malpractice or negligence, reach out to a personal injury or medical malpractice lawyer to understand if you too have a claim. Please contact any of our personal injury lawyers at Bogoroch & Associates LLP for a free consultation. 

Contact a personal injury lawyer near me by calling 1-866-599-1700 or visit our  Contact page for all inquiries.

When to Seek Help From a Personal Injury Lawyer

If you’ve been injured in an accident, it can be difficult to decide whether or not you need to seek the help of a personal injury lawyer. Many people don’t know when is the right time to contact so they wait until it’s too late – e.g. in the UK waiting for more than three years from the point of accident to making a claim, in most cases, will mean you can no longer raise a claim. Here are some things to consider when deciding if you should seek out a Personal Injury Lawyer.

If claiming for an accident or injury in America see this guide for further information https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/accident-law

If claiming for personal injury compensation in the UK see this guide

And read on for more information on when the best time is for contacting a personal injury lawyer:-

You’ve Been in an Accident

If you have been in an accident, it is important to contact a personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. Even if you think the injuries are minor or that the other party may not be at fault, a personal injury lawyer will be able to evaluate your situation and determine who is liable for the damages that have occurred. They can also help to ensure that you receive the maximum compensation for your injuries.

Additionally, an experienced personal injury lawyer can help with any insurance claims or disputes that may arise from the accident. It is important to contact a personal injury lawyer as soon as possible after an accident to ensure that all of your rights are protected.

There’s a Degree of Severity to Your Injury

One of the first things to consider when deciding if you need a Personal Injury Lawyer is the severity of your injuries. In some cases, even minor injuries can end up costing thousands of dollars in medical bills and lost wages. If your injury or injuries have resulted in substantial medical costs and lost wages, it may be time to seek out a Personal Injury Lawyer who can help you get compensation for your losses.

If you have suffered more severe physical or psychological injuries that require treatment, such as broken bones, spinal cord damage, or traumatic brain injury, then it may be time to contact a Personal Injury Lawyer as well. Injuries of this severity can often lead to hefty medical bills and significant lost wages.

A personal injury lawyer can help you receive the appropriate amount of compensation for your losses. They can also help you to seek punitive damages if the other party’s negligence caused your injury, or if they acted with malice or disregard for safety. If you believe that your injuries justify a claim, then it is vital that you contact an experienced personal injury lawyer as soon as possible.

Involvement With an Uninsured or Underinsured Driver

If you have been involved in an accident with an uninsured or underinsured driver, then it is definitely time to seek out a Personal Injury Lawyer. Without insurance coverage, there may not be any way for you to receive compensation for your losses. An experienced Personal Injury Lawyer will be able to help guide you through the process of filing a claim against the other driver, and work with their insurance company on your behalf.

Your Insurance is Denied

If your insurance company denies your claim for benefits after an accident, then this is also reason enough to seek out the assistance of a Personal Injury Lawyer as soon as possible. Insurance companies will often deny claims without providing adequate justification or explanation for their decision, leaving victims feeling frustrated and confused about how best to proceed with their case. A qualified Personal Injury Lawyer will be able to review all paperwork associated with the case and advise on next steps that should be taken in order to ensure that justice is served.

It Just Feels Needed

Finally, if you simply feel that you need legal assistance with your personal injury case, then it is important to contact a Personal Injury Lawyer as soon as possible. Even if the accident or injury seems minor or not worth pursuing further, an experienced lawyer can help evaluate the situation and provide guidance for how best to proceed. An attorney will be able to advise on all available legal options, as well as provide emotional support throughout the process. Having a trusted lawyer to turn to during this difficult time can make all the difference and ensure that you receive the justice and compensation you deserve.

No matter how kind or careful you are, you may end up injured at some point in time due to someone else’s negligence. If you’ve been injured in an accident and are struggling with medical bills or lost wages as a result, it may be wise to contact a qualified Personal Injury Lawyer who can help guide you through the legal process and ensure that justice is served on your behalf. Don’t wait until it’s too late; contact an experienced attorney today!

What is the role of technology in medical malpractice?

What is medical technology and what are the benefits?

Medical technology can be defined as the procedures, equipment, facilities, and organizational and supportive systems within which care is provided. From administrative advancements to novel surgical interventions, medical technology is rapidly changing the face of the healthcare industry.

There are various potential benefits of medical technology, one being less medication errors. Technologies such as computerized physician order entry, bar codes, and automated dispensers have been shown to reduce errors when medication is administered.

Automated medical filing and electronic health records can assist with/improve organization and legibility.

Remote patient monitoring technologies, such as smart watches, wearable fitness trackers, blood pressure monitors, and biosensors, can often measure one or more of the following functions: heart rate and pulse; heart rhythm; blood pressure; body temperature; physical activity; patient weight and BMI; calorie intake; sleep; exercise and fitness; body posture; and risk of falling. Access to this information enables treatment providers to manage a patient’s condition(s). For example, wearable electronic patches help cardiologists diagnose heart conditions, monitor heart disease progression, and administer medication. The device connects to the patient’s soft tissue to create a platform through which electronic feedback passes to capture data about the patient’s heart rate, blood oxygen levels, temperature, and blood pressure (BP) readings.

Telehealth and telemedicine have become increasingly in demand since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. These technologies can be advantageous to both patients and treatment providers. For patients, they can offer comfort, convenience, and be cost saving as they reduce travel expenses. For providers, they can reduce overhead expenses, lessen exposure to illness and infections, and improve response time.

Algorithms for diagnoses also have the potential of wide-reaching benefit. The medical world is constantly evolving with the discovery of new illnesses and treatments. Diagnostic algorithms can scan myriads of published medical journals, match a patient’s symptoms, and make diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations based on the results. These machine learning tools can also aid treatment providers with making proper referrals based on the diagnosis.

Does medical technology impact medical malpractice cases?

While medical technology can help reduce cases of negligence, it is not error-free. First, there can be manufacturer defects. In Wright Medical Technology Canada v. Taylor, 2015 NSCA 68 (CanLII), the Plaintiff commenced litigation against the Defendants, alleging negligence in the design and manufacture of a hip replacement transplant device which failed when its neck component fractured, necessitating replacement surgery two years later.

Second, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and cyber medical technologies come with cybersecurity risks. Data breaches can expose private, confidential patient information and also inadvertently lead to incorrect healthcare decisions. As mentioned above, treatment providers can rely on algorithms to make treatment decisions. If a breach results in data being deleted or altered, it can lead to wrong diagnoses or treatment plans.

Moreover, there is a human element to these automated systems – namely, learning to use and implement them. If treatment providers are not sufficiently trained in how to properly integrate digital health technologies before encountering such technologies in practice, there is a risk for medical error and subsequent medical malpractice liability. The following are examples of human-error with electronic health records:

  • The treatment provider did not check off the correct boxes when obtaining the patient’s history;
  • The treatment provider clicked delete instead of save when inputting information to the patient’s file;
  • The treatment provider failed to copy other responsible care providers;
  • The treatment provider reversed the day and month when inputting information to the patient’s file.

Take the following case example:

Presentation: A patient presented to an otolaryngologist for sinus complaints. The physician intended to order Flonase nasal spray. The patient took the medication as directed. Two weeks later, the patient went to the Emergency Department for dizziness.

Outcome: The Emergency Department physician discovered the patient was taking Flomax—a medication for enlarged prostate, one side effect of which is hypotension. The original ordering physician had entered “FLO” in the medication order screen, and the EHR automatically selected Flomax. Not noticing the error, the physician selected it.

How do you sue for medical malpractice involving medical technology?

If you are injured by medical technology, either directly or indirectly (i.e. by human error), you may be entitled to compensation. The burden of proof is on the Plaintiff to prove that the technology itself and/or the medical professional(s) using the technology provided negligent medical care and treatment, on a balance of probabilities. The parties responsible are case-specific. For example, if you are injured by medical technology while receiving care in a hospital setting, the negligent parties may include the hospital, the medical professional contracted to work for the hospital that used the technology, and/or the technology’s manufacturer, distributor, and retailer.

Meeting the burden of proof in the context of digital health can be challenging with novel questions to be determined. For example, when is it safe to offer digital first solutions for disease management? What are the accepted norms for obtaining a patient’s history and conducting an examination during a telehealth consult? How should these be documented on electronic systems? The rapidly growing use of medical technologies will bring these nuanced issues to the forefront.

Bogoroch & Associates LLP is experienced in all aspects of personal injury and medical malpractice litigation. We have the confidence and skill to advance your medical malpractice claim to settlement or trial while helping you navigate the complex medical, legal, and insurance issues.

Our experience, commitment to excellence, and reputation have long been recognized. Our founding partner, Richard M. Bogoroch, has been recognized as a leading personal injury lawyer by The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory and by The Best Lawyers in Canada. The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory and The Best Lawyers in Canada are two highly regarded lawyer rating publications.

If you or your loved one believes that you are a victim of medical malpractice or negligence, reach out to a medical malpractice lawyer to understand if you have a claim. Please contact us at Bogoroch & Associates LLP for a free consultation.

How to Reduce Legal Hold Costs in Personal Injury Litigation

You might not be a stranger to the hefty expenses that come with managing legal holds in personal injury litigation. The need to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) can add up quickly, especially when you factor in the time and resources it takes to identify, collect, and preserve relevant data.

But what if we told you there was a way to significantly reduce those costs? It’s not magic, it’s the technology and managed services.

By implementing the right tools and leveraging the expertise of a managed service provider (MSP), you can streamline the legal hold process and cut down on unnecessary expenses.

Here’s how:

Identify Key Players and Relevant Data Early On

One of the most costly mistakes you can make when it comes to legal holds is waiting too long to identify key players and relevant data. The longer you wait, the more time-consuming and expensive the process becomes. That’s why it’s important to consider using technology to help you identify potential custodians and relevant electronically stored information (ESI) as soon as possible. By leveraging analytics tools, you can quickly sift through large amounts of data to pinpoint the most relevant information.

For example, let’s say you’re representing a client who was injured in a car accident. You need to identify all potential witnesses and relevant documents, including medical records and police reports. Without technology, this process could take weeks or even months, and require significant resources from your firm. However, by using analytics tools, you can quickly identify potential witnesses based on their involvement in the accident, their proximity to the scene, and other relevant factors. You can also use these tools to locate relevant ESI, such as medical records and police reports, and determine the most efficient and effective way to preserve this information.

By identifying key players and relevant data early on, you can reduce the time and resources required to collect and preserve ESI. This can save you significant time and money in the long run, and allow you to focus on other important tasks, such as case strategy and client communication.

Implement an Automated Legal Hold Solution

Another way to reduce legal hold costs is to implement an automated legal hold solution. These tools can help you manage the entire legal hold process from start to finish, including custodian notification, data collection, and preservation.

By automating legal holds, organizations can eliminate the manual processes that can be time-consuming and error-prone. Manual processes can also result in inconsistencies in the way litigation holds are managed across different custodians or cases. Automated solutions, on the other hand, provide a consistent and reliable process for managing holds.

These advanced solutions can also help organizations manage the notification process. When a legal hold is initiated, custodians must be notified of their obligations to preserve potentially relevant ESI. Automated tools can help organizations efficiently notify custodians of their legal hold obligations, and can also track whether or not notifications have been received and acknowledged. Another benefit of using an automated solution is that it can help organizations with data collection and preservation. Once custodians have been notified of their legal hold obligations, they must identify and preserve potentially relevant ESI. This can be a daunting task, especially for organizations with large amounts of data.

Automated legal hold tools can additionally help organizations with data collection and preservation by providing custodians with clear instructions on what data needs to be preserved and how to collect it. These solutions can also help organizations collect data in a defensible manner, which is important in legal proceedings. Furthermore, these tools can also provide organizations with a centralized location for managing legal holds. This can help organizations easily track the status of each legal hold, including which custodians have been notified, which data has been collected, and which data still needs to be preserved. This can be especially helpful for organizations that are managing multiple holds at once.

In addition to reducing costs, implementing an automated solution can also help organizations reduce their legal risk. By providing a consistent and defensible process for managing legal holds, organizations can reduce the risk of spoliation or other legal consequences related to the mishandling of ESI.

When selecting an automated legal hold solution, it is important to choose a tool that is easy to use and integrates well with existing systems. Some solutions may require significant IT resources to implement and maintain, while others may be more user-friendly and require less IT support.

Leverage the Expertise of a Managed Service Provider

Implementing an effective legal hold process can be a challenging and time-consuming task. It requires identifying all potentially relevant materials, notifying custodians of their obligations to preserve materials, tracking compliance, and releasing the hold when the litigation or investigation has been resolved. In addition, legal hold management can be costly, especially for companies with large amounts of data and multiple ongoing matters. One solution to these challenges is to work with a managed service provider (MSP) that specializes in legal hold management. MSPs are third-party vendors that provide services to help companies manage various aspects of their operations, including legal hold management. These providers can help companies to streamline the legal hold process, reduce costs, and ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

An MSP can assist in the selection and implementation of an automated legal hold solution tailored to a company’s specific needs. An automated solution can reduce the administrative burden of managing legal holds by automating many of the key processes, such as the identification of custodians and the tracking of compliance. This, in turn, can save companies time and money, as well as reduce the risk of non-compliance. In addition to providing technology solutions, MSPs can also provide ongoing support and training to help companies maximize the benefits of their legal hold management programs. This includes assistance with policy development, process improvement, and risk management. With the help of an MSP, companies can ensure that they have the knowledge, skills, and tools necessary to implement and maintain effective legal hold management practices.

Working with an MSP can also provide companies with access to expertise and resources that they may not have in-house. MSPs that specialize in legal hold management are likely to have a deep understanding of the legal and regulatory landscape and the best practices for compliance. They can also provide insights into emerging trends and technologies that can help companies stay ahead of the curve. As companies grow and change, their legal hold management needs may also change. And, an MSP can help companies to adapt their programs to meet these evolving needs, whether it be through the addition of new technology solutions or the development of new policies and procedures.

Conclusions

As a personal injury lawyer, managing legal holds can be a time-consuming and expensive process. But by implementing the right tools and working with a managed service provider, you can significantly reduce those costs.

Whether you’re using analytics tools to identify key players and relevant data, implementing an automated legal hold solution, or leveraging the expertise of a managed service provider, there are many ways to streamline the legal hold process and cut down on unnecessary expenses. So why wait? Start exploring your options today and see how technology and managed services can help you reduce legal hold costs and improve your bottom line.

Alp Isin is an experienced IT professional who is passionate about delivering high-quality technology solutions to law firms. , Alp is dedicated to helping legal professionals improve their operational efficiency and productivity.

With over 20 years of experience in the IT industry, as the President of I.T. ISIN Solutions, a leading Managed Service Provider for law firms, Alp Isin has gained a deep understanding of the unique challenges that law firms face in managing their IT systems. He has built a reputation for providing exceptional support services that are tailored to meet the specific needs of his clients to optimize their operations, reduce costs and achieve their business goals.

What percentage do personal injury lawyers take on average in the UK? (New Personal Injury Law Blog)

When making a personal injury claim, many people wonder what percentage of their

compensation will go to their lawyer. It’s an important question to ask since you want to be clear on the costs and fees involved in pursuing your claim.